CRIMINAL CHARGES DROPPED

GavaghanCommunications|| 27th, July 2011. The letter adjacent is my proof that in my efforts in 2006 to contact Christopher Haddock I was doing nothing criminal. So why did he and his staff and the police treat me as such? For doing what this letter said I was charged, later acquitted on other similar charges, whilst charges I harassed C. Haddock were dropped, but with the threat, before acquittal, they might be revived. In addition, my passports back to when I was 16 are proof that in my efforts from 2004 to contact West Yorkshire Police I was doing nothing criminal. Quite the opposite. But that needs explanation, which District Judge Bennett denied me the ability to make on 22nd January 2004 (correction - 22nd January 2008). I did not dismiss my defence solicitor. I actually begged him to stay. The judge was, possibly, led down the garden path by psychiatrists with a power base to protect. My driving licence, photocard, counterfoil and driving theory test certificate are poof I was doing nothing wrong in trying to speak to police on one of the matters I was seeking to speak with them about. My degree certificate, my 11-plus results, (My CV) are proof I was at The University of Manchester legitimately.
This exchange with the Court fits into events which started 6th March, 2004, when I asked those I was staying with temporarily as a guest to take me to hospital because I felt physically unwell. Not hysteria, not mental illness, not drunk, but physically ill. It was not until abused by medics and police in 2004 that it occurred to me to write for medical records. I am appalled by the medical negligence, lack of tests, lack of informed consent and explanation, their privacy abuse and stonewalling, by a GMC which later ignored me. I was wholly co-operative in all ways with each medic until egregious and explicit abuse by them of me began. At the time, from late 2001, I had an office in Grumpy's Mill in Todmorden, above my landlord's work space, where he undertook tasks such as paint spraying, though I did not know this when I took the office space, nor did I smell anything amiss. We were also near a factory using chemicals monitored by HS&E. Within my office space I could not smell those. As I tried in 2004 and 2005 to make sense of the abuse of myself in 2004 and to seek cause - with no help of any kind from anyone, and no one giving a damn - I spoke with the workers of the nearby factory. I had also smelled a gas leak, as had others. I called HS&E, NHS Direct and the Gas Board. In mid 2005 I sought to work with my office landlord to clarify whether carbon monoxide at a low level might be impacting me, but rather than work with me my office landlord unlawfully asked me to leave. My rent was up to date, had never been in arrears, and I had complied with all he asked from me as a tenant. I know my office landlord's action was unlawful because I got a solicitor, whom I paid. I left my office because my landlord's unlawful behaviour, and refusal to answer me or my solicitor, meant I could not trust him not to throw out my books, records and work equipment. I though I might have found a way back to my career, despite the utterly needless quite wrong behaviour of professor Michael Worboys (CHSTM). My then landlord used the names in writing of Mr/Dr Green/Brown - all combinations. His behaviour in mid 2005 contributed directly to the sole tradership bankruptcy I faced at the end of 2006. He, Professor M Worboys of CHSTM, University of Manchester, Ms J Stansfield and her then senior partner, Mr J Lloyd-Jones, lying, arrogant doctors and civil liberty abusing police directly caused my bankruptcy. It is unbelievable so many people would wish to dismiss my experience as mental illness, rather than physical illness and State abuse. It was physical on 6th March and then in many ways it was State abuse. I would guess the reason they wish to dismiss me is because they think they and their lives and ills are more important than are mine. The situation in mid 2005 added to the truly rude and nasty behaviour in 2004 of Ms J Stanfield then of Linnells (now Blake Lapthorn) and are why I faced bankruptcy. I had trusted Ms Stansfield and her firm for 21 years. It is not pathological to be a client of solicitors for 21 years. Those whose wrong doing, in some cases I would guess criminal wrong doing, caused the small sole tradership bankruptcy I faced (but which to me was everything) have sought in every way imaginable to avoid taking responsibility for the wrong they did, and have in total abused their standing. I think sexism, snobbery and ignorance are probably the reason for the denial that I genuinely am the victim of significant and profound wrong doing by both State and individuals. I genuinely tried to behave throughout, in fact for years, in a timely, decent, lawful and respectful way, and I was slinging mud at no one, nor seeking to apportion blame. Simply to resolve matters. Just because people do not want something to be true, does not mean it is not true. And calling me mentally ill, whether I am or not (I am not) will not change the truth of the wrong done to me.
xx And my life itself (not to mention, I would think, my DNA and biochemistry) is proof I do not have paranoid schizophrenia, nor bipolar disorder, nor delusional disorder, as it might be medics would wish me to have (and would seem to have been saying I had) to cover their own wrong doing. For the record, I have no doubt that pathology underlies anxiety disorder, and that it is susceptible to pharmacology and therapy. And game playing pillocks cannot cause anxiety disorder. Explain to me, please, why Paul Sclare, David Burley and David Hargreaves, M Balraj, Susan Bradbury et al are not all in prison. That is where they belong, given the nature of their dishonesty. Letters from my solicitor of Blake Lapthorn (formerly Linnells in Oxford) and my bank statements (with NatWest, Leeds University Branch, from 1976 to 2006) are proof that that company and my professional relationship with them was not my fantasy. Nor is it my fantasy that Judith Stansfield of that firm told me by phone - not a false memory - in mid April 2004 that her firm had no one dealing with national security, criminal law or litigation, but to find a firm in Leeds or Bradford (correction made 19.02.2012, she actually said Manchester, not Bradford, and I quoted her correctly and privately close to the time) which did. After 21 years. No explanation. Explanation refused. She, a professional in a reputable firm, called me a bitch when I asked her. She denied me when police arrested me on June 20th, 2004. Explanation added 19.02.2012: source for the preceding assertion, Halifax Police custody record, and she called me a bitch before the existence of this record, which is not one of criminality, when I was seeking clarification in June 2004 of her words in mid April 2004, prior to a job interview with SciDevNet, and with my former editor at Nature and New Scientist. Hers was not a fly by night firm, but they behaved as charlatans. Her firm had read my EUMETSAT contract. Ms Stansfield and I had talked of my work the previous fall when I was undertaking research at Nuffield College, Oxford, as a graduate student from the University of Manchester, and was staying with her as a guest, as she had many times stayed with me. I was undertaking research on the history of science. I paid my bills. I did not ask for favours. Even now I cannot believe how much hatred must have underlain her words, action and the subsequent silence by her and her firm. I thought all would be well because Mr P Morris (a defence solicitor), in 2007, mediated a meeting for me with Mr Lloyd-Jones. Mr Lloyd-Jones canceled, refused to reschedule and sent me a postal order for 25 pounds to cover the cost of the ticket I had bought to go see him. I sent the postal order back even though I had aleady used my scant resources to buy a cheap ticket to see him. For 21 years that firm took my money, wrote my Wills and then threw me out via Ms Stansfield in 2004 when I needed them most and would give me not one courteous word of explanation, and has not done so since, and did so when Professor M. Worboys of CHSTM (16.3.04) and the medical profession and police in the Calder Valley were abusing me, obfuscating and lying through their teeth. I did not want a local solicitor. My professional life was not local. Much of my personal life was not local. I have never thought men or women were inherently sexist. But I have to question now if that is what underpinned much of what I encountered from 2004. In 2004 I loved the Calder Valley, as my nest from which I went out into the world. Everyone needs to have a place of safety, even if it is a concept in their mind not reality. Mine was the Calder Valley where I was born and bred, as the saying goes. Now and since 2004 I hate every blade of grass in it. This is a Valley which knows damn well I was abused and has said not one word of commiseration, acknowledgement or apology and done not one thing to offer me empathy, commiseration or comfort for those wrongs. It is as if others resent me for the wrong that was done to me. And on acquittal its Council put the boot in to me when I was already vulnerable after months of egregious and obscene inhuman abuse by rape minded thugs in a psychiatric unit I ought never to have seen the inside of. I dodged them, but how do these bastards live with themselves? And the solicitors I turned to for help? Each and every one totally useless. Each and very one deaf and determined to view me as a sick fantasist and determined to deny themselves to see one piece of proof to the contrary, or which would have saved me from the obscenity of life between 2004 and 2008. Each and every one a sycophant to medical folly, abuse and lies. Why does Michael Worboys of CHSTM still have a job as a head of department when he was unwilling to see through one meeting of resolution in 2004 which he had agreed to for me, one of his department's graduate students, and him, and when he was unwilling to explain the cancellation or the accusations he threw at me on 16.3.04 (did the accusation come from the Calder Valley?), when he violated my privacy by contacting my solicitor when he and no-one at the University of Manchester could have known she was my solicitor. And why did he tell me the security forces were on my case? And refuse to tell me what he was talking about. He did all of these things before I did anything which anyone could wrongly take exception to (none of which was either crime or mental illness). Why did Inpsector Ian Dellow tell me in mid summer 2004 (yes I have exact dates) that a D-Notice would apply? Why did psychiatrists make up that I thought I worked for MI 6? I have never said that I do. I do not. HMRC knows my income. Why did he tell third parties I had alleged interference by another State when I had not? I am an experienced journalist and editor. Not a fool and fantasist. It is the people (among medics, police and academics, family and friends and others) whom I had liked (loved, in some cases) and respected who chose to turn their back on me when I had done them no wrong. They should pay for the bankruptcy their lies and obfuscation caused. Though the real wrong is and was by the medical profession. 2004 destroyed my life and my family, my past and my future when I had done nothing wrong, was doing nothing wrong and intended nothing wrong. What sort of pathetic country ignores that, or thinks it is acceptable? As far as I can see it is the Mental Health Acts in existence then and now which are the problem. I am making public today (27/7/11) the letter above so that charges that I criminally harassed Christopher Haddock, or any of his staff, cannot be revived, or that if revived they are not revived in a Court which denies and ignores evidence. Ask Haddock and Co. if they still exist, why in view of this letter from the Court to me they refused to give me my paperwork in 2006 on the grounds that they needed it for a legal aid claim. That is what they told me and what they did, and I turned back from collecting paper work (a friend was giving me a lift) because they had said that, and were refusing to speak with me civilly, or to let me itemise and cross check with them my paper work. There were two letters belonging to me I needed - from 2005 and from 2006. They demonstrate police wrong doing. Not mine. But the medics are the real culprits. I had thought it was decency toward me which had led Christopher Haddock to offer to keep my paperwork. Now I wonder if it was, all along, that for some bizarre reason he did not want to give me all the paperwork which was mine, which I was asking for, or asking for a copy of. Did he want to keep paperwork in my favour away from me, whilst releasing paperwork damaging to me? Paperwork he had dumped on a mutual friend's lawn without the consent of either party. Knowing his intent was to seek to get me prosecuted for what he and other solicitors, police and medics - not I - had done wrong? Or was I in their minds too insignificant even for that thought? Is this really such a Valley of ignorance, snobbery and stupidity? Is it any wonder the prisons are full? With how many innocent people? At every step massive impatience and, it would seem, the assumption I was stupid, or had some ulterior motive, or was a liar, or had no right to courtesy and exchange and explanations, or right to give explanations. A total inability of all these people to see me as honest, non criminal and straightforward, and their equal, and not "out to get them" or anyone. If they thought they would succeed in making me see myself as psychotic and mentally ill they have failed. I am not. And medics destroyed 7 years of my life because they were not willing to say to me - you have said and done XX, and we think that, specifically, is clinically psychotic. Can you prove to the contrary, or find a witness who would speak for you? Well, have I yet shown you all the ways the things you thought were psychosis were reality, not psychosis? And are you not telling me because you think I should live a life of misery and penury and isolation? And that is what in mind numbing nastiness and denial of its wrong this country created for me. It has flushed down the toilet expertise, experience, education, decency and competence, even though I was self employed. Or do doctors withhold the specifics of their thinking about psychosis so that the accused has no defence. I really would be quite happy not to have lived one second beyond 2004. Powered by Register.Com.